[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Dec 2002 14:04:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 03:05:41AM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Is that a (however reluctant) ok for the "MACH_PORT_NULL; -1; size"
> > proposal?
>
> That is ok by me. It's also ok by me for all MACH_PORT_NULL cases to be a
> characteristic error right now, and implement it later if it ever comes up.
The only case that will be implemented right away is
MACH_PORT_NULL, 0, (vm_size_t) -1
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org address@hidden
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
address@hidden
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/
- [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/03
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/12
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/12
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/12
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/12
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Roland McGrath, 2002/12/14
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/14
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Roland McGrath, 2002/12/15
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects,
Marcus Brinkmann <=
Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/13