[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fatfs locking

From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Subject: Re: fatfs locking
Date: 29 Feb 2004 16:30:20 -0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

Marcus Brinkmann <address@hidden> writes:

> Yes.  The original idea was to provide the node pointer if the
> directory is locked, and NULL otherwise.

That sounds like an excellent approach.

> Yes, I think that is exactly what is required.  Now, hopefully you
> won't fall off the chair when you see how many interfaces are affected
> in the case of fatfs write support (as opposed to read support) ;)
> Anyway, you are making Marco very happy.

Nope, it's clear it requires a lot, because the flag basically has to
be propagated all the way up the call chain.  Unlike Roland, I've
never blanched at things that require "all callers changed" in the


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]