[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: must "cvs update" before "cvs commit", why??
From: |
Louis-David Mitterrand |
Subject: |
Re: must "cvs update" before "cvs commit", why?? |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:29:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 08:22:19AM -0500, Mike Castle wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:26:34AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> > This is really strange: often some changed files won't be committed
> > unless I perform a general "cvs update" (where this changed files appear
> > as M). After the update the "cvs commit" works fine. And FWIW I am the
> > only committer on this repository.
>
> You may be the only committer, but are you committing from only one checked
> out tree? Or did you do anything unusual on the checkout or update?
Always from the same checked-out tree and nothing unusual with the
commit or update.
Thanks,
--
Louis-David Mitterrand - address@hidden - http://www.apartia.org
** Hello and Welcome to the Psychiatric Hotline **
If you are paranoid-delusional, we know who you are and what you want
- just stay on the line so we can trace the call.