|
From: | Richard Wesley |
Subject: | Re: Why CVSREAD? |
Date: | Thu, 25 Jan 2001 11:58:28 -0800 |
Lo, on Wednesday, January 24, David L. Martin did write:----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Cobbe" <address@hidden> > > What's the CVSREAD variable for? > > I know what it does, but I was (and remain) hard-pressed to come up with a > situation in which this behavior would be useful. I'm assuming that such > situations exist; could someone provide an example? This is typically used when you want to loosely enforce the rule that developers should do a cvs edit prior to actually working on a file. Cvs edit makes a read-only file writable in addition to registering the developer to be an editor of the file.<SNIP> Sounds reasonable enough. But, rather than checking out *every* file read-only, why not use `cvs watch on'? According to section 10.6.1 of the Cederqvist (node `Setting a watch'), applying this command to specific files will cause those files (and no others) to be checked out read-only, requiring a `cvs edit' to make them read-write.
Assuming that you want to have watch on all files, then maybe CVSREAD is a little less baroque. But maybe not ;-)
Your comment also sort of implies that all projects are as organized as yours, which isn't always the case. CVSREAD as a default makes a lot of sense here to provide a basic setup that is easy to configure.
Is CVSREAD perhaps a holdover from an earlier version of CVS that didn't support watches?
I believe so.I actually have had a very odd use for it. Some VCS integration systems (e.g. CodeWarrior) require a "checked in" state and read-only is a very useful way to fake this so that CVS can be shoehorned into such systems. By setting the CVSREAD environment variable, I can make the files have the kinds of state that the IDE requires without mucking up the watchers state.
- rmgw http://www.electricfish.com/hawkfish/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard Wesley Electric Fish, Inc. address@hidden "Grownups have the most uninteresting explanations for things." - C. S. Lewis, _The Magician's Nephew_
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |