[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update()
|
From: |
Brad Chisholm |
|
Subject: |
Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update() |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:00:41 -0500 |
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:58:46PM -0500, Derek R. Price wrote:
>
> Well, it didn't seem very hard to do, so I had configure search for
> nanosleep, usleep, and select in that order, then use them in the same
> order of preference, falling back on sleep as a last resort. It speeds up
> 'make check' noticeably.
>
> Checked in.
Just curious, but will a 20 ms wait be sufficient to prevent timestamp races?
It appears the times saved in the Entries file have a granularity of 1 sec.
-Brad
- Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Brad Chisholm, 2001/02/12
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Larry Jones, 2001/02/13
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Laine Stump, 2001/02/14
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Larry Jones, 2001/02/14
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Laine Stump, 2001/02/14
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Larry Jones, 2001/02/14
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Derek R. Price, 2001/02/14
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(),
Brad Chisholm <=
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Laine Stump, 2001/02/16
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Derek R. Price, 2001/02/16
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Larry Jones, 2001/02/16
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Derek R. Price, 2001/02/16
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Paul Sander, 2001/02/15
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), laine+info-cvs, 2001/02/16