[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update()
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update() |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:02:55 -0500 (EST) |
Derek R. Price writes:
>
> Hmm... maybe later I'll make it wait more exactly when gettimeofday is
> available...
If you do, consider making it into an independent function (probably in
subrs.c) so we can do the same thing in client.c and commit.c without
replicating the code.
-Larry Jones
I'm so disappointed. -- Calvin
- Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Brad Chisholm, 2001/02/12
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Larry Jones, 2001/02/13
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Laine Stump, 2001/02/14
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Larry Jones, 2001/02/14
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Laine Stump, 2001/02/14
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Larry Jones, 2001/02/14
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Derek R. Price, 2001/02/14
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Brad Chisholm, 2001/02/16
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Laine Stump, 2001/02/16
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Derek R. Price, 2001/02/16
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(),
Larry Jones <=
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Derek R. Price, 2001/02/16
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), Paul Sander, 2001/02/15
- Re: Timestamp race avoidance in do_update(), laine+info-cvs, 2001/02/16