[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 'newbie' here, having a problem with check-out
From: |
Eric Siegerman |
Subject: |
Re: 'newbie' here, having a problem with check-out |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:47:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 10:12:49AM -0500, Patrick Lynch wrote:
> [earlier steps consist basically of importing, then checking
> out into c:/docs with WinCVS]
> 4.4 committed the c:/docs directory...
> 4.5 at this point, everything is working fine...
> 4.6 tried to check out docs from the repository and got the msg: "...*PANIC*
> adminstration files missing...",
You shouldn't need to check out again at this point, merely
update. After all, you already have a working directory. Now,
if this script isn't quite correct, and what you actually did
was:
4.61 delete c:/docs
4.62 try to do a "cvs update"
that would give you the result you saw, I think.
This certainly would:
# import
cd c:/docs # compressing 2 dos commands into 1 :-)
cvs import ...
# make a CVS sandbox, but keep the old c:/docs as a backup
cd c:/
cvs co -d docs-cvs ...
cd c:/docs-cvs
edit
commit
# forgetting that you should be working in docs-cvs now :-(
cd c:/docs
edit
commit
# kaboom! admin files are missing of course.
> 4.7 this, according to the manual, indicates a bad CVS file...
> 4.8 I deleted the CVS files from the c:/docs directories and tried to check
> out again -- no luck, get the same error msg.
Yes. Now you've explicitly created the problem it was seeing
before; what I'm wondering in the preceding paragraphs is how
*else* the same situation (missing c:/docs/CVS subdirectory)
could have arisen.
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. address@hidden
| | /
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea.
- RFC 1925 (quoting an unnamed source)