[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cvswrappers - any better suggestions ?
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: cvswrappers - any better suggestions ? |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 12:17:03 -0400 (EDT) |
David H. Thornley writes:
>
> Nope; CVS adheres to design principles that are at least somewhat
> compatible with our requirements. The fact that people are using
> CVS for the management of binary files implies that somebody can
> do it and be successful. Nor do I understand why this is inherently
> a wrong choice. I can understand why it would be the wrong choice
> under some given circumstances, but I have a great deal of difficulty
> with moral absolutes in open-source software.
People successfully use hammers to insert screws. That doesn't mean a
hammer is the right tool (or even a good tool) for the job.
> Heck, I don't even want to write to tool manufacturers and tell
> them that they need to make screwdrivers more paint-can-lid
> compatible.
But that's exactly what you're doing with CVS.
-Larry Jones
Wheeee. -- Calvin
- RE: cvswrappers - any better suggestions ?, (continued)
Re: cvswrappers - any better suggestions ?, David H. Thornley, 2001/04/02
RE: cvswrappers - any better suggestions ?, Peter Ring, 2001/04/02
RE: cvswrappers - any better suggestions ?, Paul Sander, 2001/04/02
RE: cvswrappers - any better suggestions ?, Paul Sander, 2001/04/02