[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: CVS bashing?
From: |
Chuck . Irvine |
Subject: |
RE: CVS bashing? |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:58:20 -0500 |
There are obviously some areas where CVS can be improved - no doubt.
But if you compare it to some other commercial SCM system that I'm
familiar with, e.g. ENVY that comes with IBM's Visual Age for Java or
PVCS, it is much, much superior. If ClearCase were free I'm pretty sure
that I would choose it over CVS, but it's anything buy free. The
Subversion project is interesting, but they will no doubt barrow a lot
from CVS, if not code, then at least design and functionality. The
bottom line is that you can do a lot, lot worse than CVS, even if you
choose a commercial tool. My two cents...
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gary.heuston [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 1:04 PM
> To: info-cvs
> Subject: CVS bashing?
>
>
> Someone brought up a site on another mailing list about CVS and its
> limitations and was citing this as a reason to not use
> CVS...what do you
> all think about this? Some of this stuff I have personally witmessed
> (i.e. large binary file problem, no directory versioning) but I'm
> curious as to others opinions...
>
> http://www.snuffybear.com/scm_grind_cvs.htm
>
> Gary
> address@hidden
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Info-cvs mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
>
- Re: CVS bashing?, (continued)
Re: CVS bashing?, Alexander Kamilewicz, 2001/04/18
Re: CVS bashing?, Paul Sander, 2001/04/11
RE: CVS bashing?,
Chuck . Irvine <=
RE: CVS bashing?, Jerry Nairn, 2001/04/11
RE: CVS bashing?, Jerry Nairn, 2001/04/11
Re: CVS bashing?, Noel L Yap, 2001/04/12
Re: CVS bashing?, Mike Castle, 2001/04/12
Re: CVS bashing?, Noel L Yap, 2001/04/12
Re: CVS bashing?, Mike Castle, 2001/04/12