[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS & SSL
From: |
Greg A. Woods |
Subject: |
Re: CVS & SSL |
Date: |
Tue, 22 May 2001 00:16:28 -0400 (EDT) |
[ On Monday, May 21, 2001 at 17:12:11 (-0400), Derek R. Price wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: CVS & SSL
>
> P.S. the following script is necessary to use tcpclient with the patch:
>
> address@hidden ccvs-ssl]$ cat tmp.sh
> #! /bin/sh
> cat <&6 &
> cat >&7
>
> tell tcpclient to exec tmp.sh. This turns the 'tcpclient hostname port sh
> `pwd`/tmp.sh' call into a straight socket pipe which is what I wrote the CVS
> patch
> to require.
OK, I'm really really really confused now. Why the heck does CVS need
changing in any way to use stunnel????
Why not just use stunnel to tunnel RSH through? Or alternately write a
little wrapper script that looks like 'rsh' from the command-line but
uses stunnel to create the connection and start the server on the other
side?
Why does this have to be made so "difficult"?
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>; Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>
- CVS & SSL, Derek R. Price, 2001/05/21
- Re: CVS & SSL, Derek R. Price, 2001/05/21
- Re: CVS & SSL,
Greg A. Woods <=
- Re: CVS & SSL, Derek R. Price, 2001/05/22
- Re: CVS & SSL, Greg A. Woods, 2001/05/22
- Re: CVS & SSL, Derek R. Price, 2001/05/23
- Re: CVS & SSL, Greg A. Woods, 2001/05/23
- Re: CVS & SSL, Derek R. Price, 2001/05/23
- Re: CVS & SSL, Greg A. Woods, 2001/05/23
- Re: CVS & SSL, Derek R. Price, 2001/05/24
- Re: CVS & SSL, Derek R. Price, 2001/05/24
- Re: CVS & SSL, Greg A. Woods, 2001/05/24
- Re: CVS & SSL, Derek R. Price, 2001/05/24