[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Future CVS Development

From: Derek R. Price
Subject: Re: Future CVS Development
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:30:00 -0400

Noel L Yap wrote:

> >Now there's the rub... it requires patches to get advisory locks.  I'm
> >talking about baseline CVS, as shipped out-of-the-box.   And, the patches
> >aren't necessarily kept up-to-date with the latest CVS.
> Yes, I would very much love seeing these patches as part of CVS proper.  
> They're
> missing test and toc patches (and another  volunteer will need to submit 
> these).
> Once these are in, the patches'll have a bigger chance of being included.

Not counting any code/tests anybody decides to nitpick, they'd probably have a
pretty good chance.  I haven't heard any rumblings in response to my repeated
threats to include the changes in the main tree if they came with doc, 
and tests.


Derek Price                      CVS Solutions Architect ( )
mailto:address@hidden         CollabNet ( )
Life in a vacuum sucks.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]