[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: using the right tool for the job!

From: Robert Koberg
Subject: Re: using the right tool for the job!
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 07:31:34 -0700

I agree.  This is patheitic - both sides. I have been dipping in every now
and again, but it seems to be the same argument over and over. I am just on
this list to pick up the basics I need to do my job (development not admin).
I don't want to leave.

This attachment thing... If he did this on purpose, he is in direct
opposition to rules (? I don't know I did not check...) about sending
attachments to lists.

ListAdmin: Can he be removed for this blatant disregard for others and the

----- Original Message -----
From: "Donald Sharp" <address@hidden>
To: "Greg A. Woods" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: using the right tool for the job!

> On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 03:22:04AM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > [ On Thursday, July 19, 2001 at 01:17:10 (-0400), Lenny Foner wrote: ]
> > > Subject: using the right tool for the job!
> > >
> > > To say I doubt this so-called explanation it putting it mildly.
> > > I think you just didn't think through the implications of your
> > > actions, and are trying to backpedal now that someone's called
> > > you on it.  And I don't really care to hear yet another excuse
> > > about how you're so much cleverer than anyone else in doing this.
> >
> > Oh, I'm not back-pedalling!  Quite the opposite!  I thought through my
> > actions very carefully and proceeded with very deliberate purpose!  I'd
> > do it all again (though maybe with about half the content -- two parts
> > would proabably have been suffient to get the point across with
> > sufficient irony; I just couldn't be bothered to pre-test it to see how
> > many parts it would be broken down into by my MUA).
> Alright this just pushes me over the edge.  Why didn't you send
> these attachments to the people you were arguing with?  I
> wasn't interested in any of the arguements that you have ongoing so I
> stopped reading them.  Instead I get 1/2 meg of crap in my inbox.
> are you trying to teach a lesson to?  and why did it include the 99% of
> people on this list who could give a rat's ass?
> donald
> _______________________________________________
> Info-cvs mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]