[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Coflict marker detection proposal

From: Noel L Yap
Subject: Re: Coflict marker detection proposal
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:26:51 -0400

>[ On Friday, July 20, 2001 at 06:56:43 (-0400), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: Coflict marker detection proposal
>> I don't recall participating in a _philosophical discussion on theory_ but I
>> recall discussing practical features that currently exist in tools than CVS.
>Well, your memory really is short then.  Why we were discussing
>theoretical implementations of better handling for non-mergable files
>just the other day!

I don't recall that as being a _philosophical discussion on theory_.

>> I (and it looks like many others) disagree.  CVS must not insist on this.
>Well it does anyway -- I just want it returned to enforcing its
>insistence instead of making lame warnings.

A warning is not insistance.

>> Then please call your tool something other than CVS (GVS maybe ;-)
>I haven't called it anything yet, but if I did call it something I might
>use the name NCVS (and because we now know your memory is really short,
>let me remind you that of course this serves as at least the second
>claim to that name that I've made).

OK, so we're in agreement that CVS will not adopt this behaviour.


This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its
subsidiaries and affiliates.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]