[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Results of egrep -l '^<<<<<<< |^=======$|^>>>>>>> |^\|\|\|\|\|\|\| '

From: Greg A. Woods
Subject: Re: Results of egrep -l '^<<<<<<< |^=======$|^>>>>>>> |^\|\|\|\|\|\|\| '
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:33:00 -0400 (EDT)

[ On Tuesday, July 24, 2001 at 14:18:23 (-0400), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Results of egrep -l '^<<<<<<< |^=======$|^>>>>>>> 
> |^\|\|\|\|\|\|\| '
> Whether the vendor takes these changes is irrelevent.  What matters is what
> you're keeping track of in your repository.  CVS has never forced anyone to 
> have
> one checkin represent two change sets.  There's no reason for it to start now.

Noel!!!!!  So DON'T CHECK IN TWO SEPARATE CHANGE SETS!!!!!  That's the
helpful way to do it since it clearly delineates the purpose for both
changes, but you can do it any way YOU want to!!!!!!

Your nit-picking ill-concieved and poorly thought out complaints are
getting a bit too much here....  Please learn to think about the whole
problem, from start to finish, before you try to raise silly objections.
If you still insist on raising silly objections then at least qualify
them as such and show that you have thought about the entire problem not
just one aspect out of context!

                                                        Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098      VE3TCP      <address@hidden>     <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>;   Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]