[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(no subject)

From: root
Subject: (no subject)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 05:03:30 -0400

>From address@hidden  Wed Jan 31 17:09:21 2001
>Return-Path: <address@hidden>
Received: from ( [])
        by (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id 
        for <address@hidden>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:09:18 +0900
Received: from localhost ([]
        by with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
        id 14NsHP-0000TY-00; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:06:15 -0500
Received: from [] (
        by with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
        id 14NsFC-00088Q-00
        for <address@hidden>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:03:59 -0500
Received: from (develop05 [])
        by (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA10496
        for <address@hidden>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:10:26 GMT
From: James Lyon <address@hidden>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.49) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091
Reply-To: James Lyon <address@hidden>
Organization: Axoria Ltd
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
To: CVS Info List <address@hidden>
Subject: "Concurrent" VS...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: address@hidden
Errors-To: address@hidden
X-BeenThere: address@hidden
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:address@hidden>
List-Post: <mailto:address@hidden>
List-Subscribe: <>,
List-Id: Announcements and discussions for the CVS version control system 
List-Unsubscribe: <>,
List-Archive: <>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:07:34 +0000
Status: O
Content-Length: 504
Lines: 18

Requiring Version Control, I have installed CVS for evaluation. (I
have used SCCS in the past but systems are different here now.)

One of my principal reasons for using a VC system is to avoid the
version discrepancies that arise from two separate developers
inadvertently editing the same file at the same time.

Have I selected the wrong VC system?


Info-cvs mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]