[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(no subject)

From: root
Subject: (no subject)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 05:06:16 -0400

>From address@hidden  Sat Feb  3 00:16:49 2001
>Return-Path: <address@hidden>
Received: from ( [])
        by (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id 
        for <address@hidden>; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 00:16:47 +0900
Received: from localhost ([]
        by with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
        id 14OhvV-0008Ni-00; Fri, 02 Feb 2001 10:15:05 -0500
Received: from [] (
        by with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
        id 14Ohsg-0007eJ-00
        for <address@hidden>; Fri, 02 Feb 2001 10:12:10 -0500
Received: from (develop05 [])
        by (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA26662;
        Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:18:25 GMT
From: James Lyon <address@hidden>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.49) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091
Reply-To: James Lyon <address@hidden>
Organization: Axoria Ltd
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
To: "Noel L Yap" <address@hidden>
CC: cvs Info List <address@hidden>
Subject: Re[2]: "Concurrent" VS...
In-reply-To: <address@hidden>
References: <address@hidden>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: address@hidden
Errors-To: address@hidden
X-BeenThere: address@hidden
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:address@hidden>
List-Post: <mailto:address@hidden>
List-Subscribe: <>,
List-Id: Announcements and discussions for the CVS version control system 
List-Unsubscribe: <>,
List-Archive: <>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:15:16 +0000
Status: O
Content-Length: 1323
Lines: 36

NLY> I think the problem any VC system is supposed to solve is to
NLY> prevent multiple people from editing the same file at the same
NLY> time. CVS does this. Instead, people edit different copies of the
NLY> same file at the same time. The first person to checkin succeeds.
NLY> CVS will prevent checkins by others and will display a message
NLY> saying that they'll have to perform a merge (via cvs update).

Thanks for the information ... I've only dipped-into docs so far and
had found nothing obvious before I got really heavily committed to the
installation! I shall use the reserved approach I suspect, and improve
our management so we have the faintest idea who's editing whose files!


NLY> To:   address@hidden
NLY> cc:   (bcc: Noel L Yap)
NLY> Subject:  "Concurrent" VS...

NLY> Requiring Version Control, I have installed CVS for evaluation. (I
NLY> have used SCCS in the past but systems are different here now.)

NLY> One of my principal reasons for using a VC system is to avoid the
NLY> version discrepancies that arise from two separate developers
NLY> inadvertently editing the same file at the same time.

NLY> Have I selected the wrong VC system?

Info-cvs mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]