[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(no subject)

From: root
Subject: (no subject)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 05:25:28 -0400

>From address@hidden  Fri Feb 16 08:40:28 2001
>Return-Path: <address@hidden>
Received: from (address@hidden [])
        by (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id 
        for <address@hidden>; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:40:26 +0900
Received: from localhost ([]
        by with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
        id 14TXtd-0001rt-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:33:09 -0500
Received: from ([])
        by with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
        id 14TXt7-0001rQ-00
        for <address@hidden>; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:32:37 -0500
Received: from by
          via smtpd (for []) with SMTP; 15 Feb 
2001 23:25:32 UT
Received: by oresisexchange.oresis with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
        id <16TQ9NMS>; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:32:39 -0800
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
From: Matthew Berney <address@hidden>
To: "'address@hidden'" <address@hidden>
Cc: Fauzi Ashurex <address@hidden>,
  John Raykowski <address@hidden>
Subject: Strange symptom with cvs status when merge between branches
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Sender: address@hidden
Errors-To: address@hidden
X-BeenThere: address@hidden
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:address@hidden>
List-Post: <mailto:address@hidden>
List-Subscribe: <>,
List-Id: Announcements and discussions for the CVS version control system 
List-Unsubscribe: <>,
List-Archive: <>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:32:31 -0800
Status: O
Content-Length: 641
Lines: 22

We are using a CVS pserver model with Linix Server and NT clients.  We are
running CVS v1.10.8.  

We have three branches in the repository:  IP2, IP3, R2_0

When we merge files between IP2 and IP3, then do a cvs status on R2_0, then
some of the files show up as "Needs Patch".  I am confused.  Why is the R2_0
branch effected by the merge operation when it wasn't even participating in
the merge?

Please reply via email since I am not on the discussion group.


Matt Berney
Oresis Communications

Info-cvs mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]