[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Locking support
Noel L Yap
RE: Locking support
Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:24:31 -0400
>Of course you might ask someone already in the water if it's deep enough
>for you to dive in, but they did, and you gave them a truthful answer.
>If they were afraid they couldn't do a shallow dive then they should
>have just gone for a belly flop and hoped the pain would be over soon.
>(After all they weren't getting back off the diving board with that
>bully standing back there telling them to jump or be pushed! ;-)
To many developers, concurrent development isn't just diving into a pool, it's
more like cliff diving. Just because someone else was able to do it (and
possibly even enjoys it) doesn't mean it'll be a pleasant experience for them.
>You sure as heck don't usually go diving, even just off the edge of the
>pool with crutches under your arms....
This is true, but a parachute (or something more appropriate) to slow one down
might be enough for others to try out cliff diving.
>(Now the "cvs edit" stuff (patched or not) isn't a crutch if it's being
>used as *the* primary developer intercommunications tool, but I'm not
>sure it's suitable for that, so I still don't really see much point in
The "cvs edit -c" patch isn't meant to be a intercommunication tool, it's meant
to facilitate interdeveloper communication by giving more information to the
developer at the time it's appropriate. For example, it's not a medium for
communication (eg email or telephone), but it should inspire someone to use such
a medium when the time arises.
In this light, I think it serves its purpose well (if not perfectly) when used
properly. Why do you think otherwise?
If one were to make "cvs edit" more of a communication tool, one can add edit
comments that'll get reported when one does a "cvs editors". Of course, such
comments may or may not be enough to decide whether to do a "cvs edit -f".
This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its
subsidiaries and affiliates.
RE: Locking support,
Noel L Yap <=
RE: Locking support, Noel L Yap, 2001/08/23
Re: Locking support, Noel L Yap, 2001/08/28
- Re: Locking support, (continued)
- Re: Locking support, Larry Jones, 2001/08/31
- Moving CVS Repository - Uncommited local changes, PRUDHVIDHAR lingala, 2001/08/31
- Re: Moving CVS Repository - Uncommited local changes, Matt Riechers, 2001/08/31
- Re: Moving CVS Repository - Uncommited local changes, Shyam L, 2001/08/31
- Re: Moving CVS Repository - Uncommited local changes, Larry Jones, 2001/08/31
- Re: Moving CVS Repository - Uncommited local changes, Greg A. Woods, 2001/08/31
- Merging changes from main line in to branch, PRUDHVIDHAR lingala, 2001/08/31