[Fwd: Meta-issue: recent spam surge]

[Derek Robert Price]

Anyone have any objections to this spam filter being applied to the
info-cvs and bug-cvs lists?

Aside from the "(no subject)" filter which would filter the cvsbug
generated emails on bug-cvs, of course.

Derek
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: Meta-issue: recent spam surge
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:17:52 -0400 (EDT)
>
>
>
>
> > I'm not really comfortable modifying list settings on lists I'm not
> > "affiliated with", even if I could.  The maintainers for those lists
> > should just pick it up from the mailman settings for the autoconf list...
> > (It's in the Privacy Settings section).
>
> bounce_matching_headers for address@hidden:
>
> Subject:[ (]*no subject[) ]*$
> Subject: *$
> Subject: *[A-Za-z]scribe$
> Subject:.*                     .*
> Subject:.*[^A-Za-z](product|sex|stock|revenue|sale|rich|toner|manegment|adv)[^A-Za-z]
> Subject: *(antigen|scanmail)
> Content-Type: *text/html
> From: Hahaha <address@hidden>
> X-AD2000-Serial:
> X-Bulkmail:
> X-Mailer: Email Collector
> X-EM-Version:
> X-Courtesy-Of:
> X-MSMail-Priority: High
>
> Should be sufficient if require_explicit_destination is set.
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Pavel Roskin
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---