[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: killing a branch
From: |
Eric Siegerman |
Subject: |
Re: killing a branch |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 16:22:58 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:18:23PM -0600, David Everly wrote:
> After I merge a branch into the trunk, I would like to make it so that
> people cannot commit to the branch anymore. Would someone please suggest
> a good way of doing this?
Would it suffice to "cvs rm" everything on the branch, so that
when someone goes "cvs update -rbranch", they get nothing?
That wouldn't *prevent* someone from committing to the branch,
but it'd give them a pretty strong hint that doing so isn't what
they really want...
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. address@hidden
| | /
The world has been attacked. The world must respond ... [but] we must
be guided by a commitment to do what works in the long run, not by what
makes us feel better in the short run.
- Jean Chrétien, Prime Minister of Canada
- killing a branch, David Everly, 2001/10/03
- Re: killing a branch,
Eric Siegerman <=