Re: Basic usage question

[James A. N. Stauffer]

--- Kaz Kylheku <address@hidden> wrote:
> If people cheat by committing only the files that they modified, they
> can get around the up to date check. But that is a bad idea because
> the changes you make in one set of files can semantically conflict with
> changes in another set of files.

So are you saying that committing all changes at once is better than
committing each change individually?  If yes, how can distinct messages be
used for each modified file when they are all committed at once?

=====
=    o o o o o o o . . .  __________________________ _____=======_||___
   o      _____           |  James A. N. Stauffer  | | Stauffer_James |
 .][__n_n_|DD[  ====____  | Spam food: address@hidden | |   @yahoo.com   |
>(________|__|_[________]_|________________________|_|________________|
_/oo OOOOO oo`  ooo  ooo  'o¬o¬o              o¬o¬o` 'o¬o          o¬o`

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/