Re: Major revision number compatibility?

[Larry Jones]

Thomas Eliassson writes:
> 
> This also means that it's perfectly ok (even preferred) for new files to 
> be numbered with 1.1, as long as I can still track files from before we 
> had CVS. I also checked that this is the way it works (at least with our 
> CVS setup), so if one file in the directory has rev. 2.6, a newly added 
> file will have rev.no. 1.1.

No, that isn't the way it works.  If the highest existing rev. no. in
the directory is 2.6, a newly added file will have rev. 2.1.

-Larry Jones

In my opinion, we don't devote nearly enough scientific research
to finding a cure for jerks. -- Calvin