[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Major revision number compatibility?
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Major revision number compatibility? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:43:27 -0500 (EST) |
Thomas Eliassson writes:
>
> This also means that it's perfectly ok (even preferred) for new files to
> be numbered with 1.1, as long as I can still track files from before we
> had CVS. I also checked that this is the way it works (at least with our
> CVS setup), so if one file in the directory has rev. 2.6, a newly added
> file will have rev.no. 1.1.
No, that isn't the way it works. If the highest existing rev. no. in
the directory is 2.6, a newly added file will have rev. 2.1.
-Larry Jones
In my opinion, we don't devote nearly enough scientific research
to finding a cure for jerks. -- Calvin