[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: refactoring when using CVS
From: |
Kaz Kylheku |
Subject: |
Re: refactoring when using CVS |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Feb 2002 01:52:41 GMT |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.6.3 (Linux) |
In article <address@hidden>, Noel Yap wrote:
>--- "Greg A. Woods" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> [ On Wednesday, February 20, 2002 at 07:45:24
>> (-0800), Noel Yap wrote: ]
>> > Subject: Re: Converting ClearCase to CVS
>> >
>> > One of the most current arenas where CVS is not an
>> > ideal tool is Java development since refactoring
>> > causes renaming and moving of files.
>>
>> Refactoring in C could just as easily leave you with
>> a whole lot of
>> deleted files and a whole lot of new files.
>
>The difference is that as a language, C doesn't demand
>such changes (ie renames and moves), while Java does.
Java packaging is unbelievably idiotic, and it needs to be fixed.
- Re: refactoring when using CVS,
Kaz Kylheku <=
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Thornley, David, 2002/02/21
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/21
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/21
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/21
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/21
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/22
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/22
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/22
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/22
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/23