[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CVS Update Behaviour

From: Noel Yap
Subject: Re: CVS Update Behaviour
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 06:37:35 -0800 (PST)

--- "Greg A. Woods" <address@hidden> wrote:
> [ On Friday, February 22, 2002 at 13:25:37 (-0800),
> Paul Sander wrote: ]
> > Subject: Re: CVS Update Behaviour
> >
> > And every time a merge is done from a branch where
> a rename was done on
> > one of the branches.
> And what has been said about that for years now? 

Because the tool is broken under such circumstances. 
It's broken because it claims to be concurrent, but
under such circumstances, it's not.

> > Not renaming files is a fine workaround for
> lacking the ability to rename
> > files, if you can live with it.  You can obviously
> live with it, but some
> > of us cannot.
> Who said you can't rename files?  You just have to
> plan for it.

And serialize development while you're doing it.


Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]