Re: renames under CVS

[Noel Yap]

--- "Greg A. Woods" <address@hidden> wrote:
> You're still thinking with the mindset of a
> feature-ware developer.

No, my mindset, as if it weren't clear by now, is that
CVS is broken -- it doesn't handle concurrent
development under this situation.

> So you're not willing to follow a very simple and
> clearly documented
> procedure for something you do so infrequently that
> it wouldn't even
> show up in a bell curve of functions used in your
> tools, let alone an
> unadjusted count?

Your "very simple and clearly documented procedure is
broken".  One would need to serialise development
while doing it and it doesn't handle multiple renames
within one change set.

Noel

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com