[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: renaming under CVS

From: Noel Yap
Subject: Re: renaming under CVS
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:05:35 -0800 (PST)

--- Paul Sander <address@hidden> wrote:
> >--- Forwarded mail from address@hidden
> >In the original scenario both developers were
> working on different
> >branches.
> The treatment of renames during merges should work
> the same way
> regardless of whether or not the two developers
> share a branch.
> A 3-way merge is a 3-way merge, and the point here
> is that
> directories should be treated in substantially the
> same way as
> files, with regard to merging changes to their
> contents (i.e.
> the mapping between version histories and the
> location of a
> version in the directory trees).

I agree that a 3-way merge is a 3-way merge, but
directory versioning is an ideal I'm not sure CVS can
achieve.  (But the wheels are still churning on this


Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]