Re: CVS Update Behaviour

[Donald Sharp]

Hey -

Can you guys take this offline?

thanks!

donald
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:37:10AM -0500, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Tuesday, February 26, 2002 at 23:51:29 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ]
> > Subject: Re: CVS Update Behaviour
> >
> > My point was that very few programmers, including the seasoned toolsmiths
> > who read this list, know and regularly use all of the tools at their
> > disposal.
> 
> Then you have confirmed that your point is irrelevant, just as I said it was.
> 
> >  Yes, some of the tools I listed are nearly worthless (or at
> > least have better alternatives).  And in my world, "patch" also falls
> > into that category.  (I don't know why Greg seems to have a problem with
> > this fact.)
> 
> I have no problem with the fact you consider 'patch' to be useless for
> your needs.  I do have a very major problem with the fact that you don't
> have any alternative that's better for your needs.  This is clearly why
> you've had so much problems with file renames.  Clearly you should be
> using 'patch' (or desparately trying to find something equally capable)
> because it solves problems you've apparently left un-solved and which
> you've continually whined and moaned about in this forum for literally
> years now.
> 
> -- 
>                                                               Greg A. Woods
> 
> +1 416 218-0098;  <address@hidden>;  <address@hidden>;  <address@hidden>
> Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Info-cvs mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs