Re: Major cvs surgery, need suggestions

[Timur Aydin]

"David A. Desrosiers" <address@hidden> writes:

> 
>       What I have found which works, but is very tedious to do is:
> 
>       I disagree. Doing the cvs remove/add locally is the most harmful to my
> goals (preserve history, changes, and revision per file). Using the
> process I've shown above seems to work perfectly, except it's very tedious
> to plod through so many files and directories.

Let's assume that you took the time to go through this procedure. How
can you ever be sure that you didn't make a mistake along the way?
After you are done with this procedure, you would have to build all
past versions of your projects that have been released to customers
and for each of these versions, you would have to verify that you are
getting the same files/binaries as the ones you had released in the
past.

Too much work for too little return, I think...

--
Timur Aydin