[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Abandoned CVS server processes
From: |
Dan Peterson |
Subject: |
Re: Abandoned CVS server processes |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:07:31 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) |
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Larry Jones wrote:
> > 2. Two processes; the first has a parent of "inet" and it's child
> > seems to be spinning and using lots of CPU (after about 34 hours one
> > process has used about 24 hours of CPU). The sockets associated with
> > the first process are in an IDLE state.
>
> That would indicate a bug in CVS.
>
> > I attached to each of the processes in this state with gdb and
> > determined they were spinning in a tight loop inside
> > rcs.c:translate_symtag().
>
> This is a bug that I just recently fixed -- translate_symtag would go
> into an infinite loop if the tag was "".
What do you mean if the tag was ""? Does that mean there's a file that
contains a blank tag? Or they're trying to operate on a file and specify
-r "", or something else?
In other words, how can I test this? Do I need to checkin a file that
contains a specific type of tag, or do I just need to run a specific
command (or commands) on any file?
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, (continued)
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, Dan Peterson, 2002/03/06
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, Larry Jones, 2002/03/07
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, Dan Peterson, 2002/03/07
- CVS "Official" Releases, Dan Peterson, 2002/03/08
- Connection hijacking, Brian Smith, 2002/03/08
- Re: CVS "Official" Releases, Larry Jones, 2002/03/09
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, David Fuller, 2002/03/08
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, Larry Jones, 2002/03/08
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes,
Dan Peterson <=
- Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, Larry Jones, 2002/03/15
Re: Abandoned CVS server processes, Dan Peterson, 2002/03/04