Re: arch

[david]

> address@hidden writes:
> 
> >> Has anyone taken a look at arch?  I saw an announcement about it,
> >> but nothing more.  It is an improvement over cvs and subversion.
> >> 
> > Do you have any sort of URL?  "arch" isn't something that lends
> > itself to a Google search, so I don't really know where to find
> > it.
> 
> http://www.regexps.com/ but the arch area is unavailable right now.
> 
Thank you, but in that case I wouldn't describe it as an improvement,
since both CVS and subversion have at least a presence, and are
available.  I currently don't consider subversion as an improvement
over CVS, since I trust CVS as I can download it today far more
than subversion as I can download it today.  I will keep an eye
on that URL, though.

David H. Thornley                        | If you want my opinion, ask.
address@hidden                       | If you don't, flee.
http://www.thornley.net/~thornley/david/ | O-