[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎó
|
From: |
Les Bell |
|
Subject: |
Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê |
|
Date: |
Tue, 9 Apr 2002 07:54:22 +1000 |
Absolutely! I have never before seen such an egregious example of list
abuse by spammers.
Before moderation, how about the simpler step of simply denying all posts
by non-members? I can see no legitimate reason why a CVS user would want to
post to the list and not receive replies.
But if that is not possible (?), then please, please, moderate!
Best,
--- Les [http://www.lesbell.com.au]
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê,
Les Bell <=
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, R P Herrold, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, Terry Spafford, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing th e list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåe ÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, Thomas S. Urban, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, Adam P., 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, Joi Ellis, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] eQN, Robert J. Clark, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB23 12] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN· ½Ê, Brian Poynor, 2002/04/08