[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ampersand module question

From: Jay Glanville
Subject: Re: Ampersand module question
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:57:19 GMT

"Pierre Asselin" <address@hidden> wrote in message
> In <address@hidden> "Jay
Glanville" <address@hidden> writes:
> >Thanks Martin.  It's a good start, but not all that I was looking for.
> >using the "-d" option, what I'm doing is "front-loading" the naming
> >architecture.  In other words, anytime I use module amp1, it will be
under a
> >directory tools
> I create dummy modules for that purpose.  For example,
>     amp1    path/to/amp1
>     amp2    path/to/amp2
>     _amp1   -d tools/amp1   path/to/amp1
>     mod     path/to/mod &_amp1 &amp2
> The convention is that a module beginning with an underscore is not
> meant to be checked out by itself --although nothing prevents you to.

Thanks Pierre.  This makes sense.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]