[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: merge mode for XML
From: |
Greg A. Woods |
Subject: |
RE: merge mode for XML |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 14:46:45 -0400 (EDT) |
[ On Monday, April 29, 2002 at 09:54:50 (-0400), Gary Bisaga wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: merge mode for XML
>
> >Doesn't everyone format their XML like that? I.e. like HTML so that
> >tags are on their own lines and there are extra blank lines (that won't
> >be treated as data) between groups of items and even between items too?
>
> Not only do tools not always follow these rules, you can't even always treat
> HTML like that. Besides making a huge file, it messes up the rendering of
> tables with sliced-up images.
I'm not talking about placing blank lines and/or comments in places
where they would be considered part of the data. There are plenty of
places to do so without affecting the interpretation of the data.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>
- RE: merge mode for XML, (continued)
- RE: merge mode for XML, Paul Sander, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XML, Sean Hager, 2002/04/30
- RE: merge mode for XML, Greg A. Woods, 2002/04/30
- RE: merge mode for XML, Noel Yap, 2002/04/30
- Re: merge mode for XML, Paul Sander, 2002/04/30
- RE: merge mode for XML, Gary Bisaga, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XMLp, Joi Ellis, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XMLp, Gary Bisaga, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XML,
Greg A. Woods <=
- RE: merge mode for XML, Noel Yap, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XML, Greg A. Woods, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XML, Noel Yap, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XML, Greg A. Woods, 2002/04/30
- RE: merge mode for XML, Noel Yap, 2002/04/30