[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: merge mode for XML
From: |
Noel Yap |
Subject: |
RE: merge mode for XML |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:25:48 -0700 (PDT) |
--- "Greg A. Woods" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Not only do tools not always follow these rules,
> you can't even always treat
> > HTML like that. Besides making a huge file, it
> messes up the rendering of
> > tables with sliced-up images.
>
> I'm not talking about placing blank lines and/or
> comments in places
> where they would be considered part of the data.
> There are plenty of
> places to do so without affecting the interpretation
> of the data.
In theory, this is easy to do, but in practice I have
seen browsers act differently due to whitespace that
really shouldn't affect the rendering. IIRC,
"<table><tr>" worked differently from "<table>\n<tr>"
on at least one browser.
Noel
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com
- RE: merge mode for XML, (continued)
- RE: merge mode for XML, Greg A. Woods, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XML, Paul Sander, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XML, Sean Hager, 2002/04/30
- RE: merge mode for XML, Greg A. Woods, 2002/04/30
- RE: merge mode for XML, Noel Yap, 2002/04/30
- Re: merge mode for XML, Paul Sander, 2002/04/30
- RE: merge mode for XML, Gary Bisaga, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XMLp, Joi Ellis, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XMLp, Gary Bisaga, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XML, Greg A. Woods, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XML,
Noel Yap <=
- RE: merge mode for XML, Greg A. Woods, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XML, Noel Yap, 2002/04/29
- RE: merge mode for XML, Greg A. Woods, 2002/04/30
- RE: merge mode for XML, Noel Yap, 2002/04/30