[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tag locking change
From: |
Eric Siegerman |
Subject: |
Re: Tag locking change |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:08:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 02:01:36PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Monday, October 7, 2002 at 12:39:29 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ]
> > Anyone who does an rtag without specifying an explicit revision to tag
> > gets exactly what they deserve.
>
> This part I sort of agree with, though strictly to say such a thing
> you'd have to force them to never tag against the head of a branch with
> rtag.
By default anyway. Users should probably be allowed to force the
issue. Too bad "cvs rtag -[fF]" are both taken :-)
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. address@hidden
| | /
The acronym for "the powers that be" differs by only one letter
from that for "the pointy-haired boss".
- Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/06
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/06
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change,
Eric Siegerman <=
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Mark, 2002/10/07
- Re: Tag locking change, Larry Jones, 2002/10/08
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/08
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/08
- Re: Tag locking change, Paul Sander, 2002/10/08
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Mike Ayers, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/09
- Re: Tag locking change, Adam Bregenzer, 2002/10/09