[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tag locking change

From: Greg A. Woods
Subject: Re: Tag locking change
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:04:07 -0400 (EDT)

[ On Wednesday, October 9, 2002 at 11:26:08 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Tag locking change
> Greg A. Woods writes:
> > 
> > I think the issue is some of us don't want 'cvs rtag' to "work" when the
> > intent is to tag the head of a branch, especially not with the new more
> > per-directory-only locking scheme
> Just to reemphasize, the per-directory locking scheme is not "new", it's
> what all versions of CVS prior to 1.11.1 used.  The change to locking
> the entire tree in CVS 1.11.1 was a stop-gap fix for a serious bug that
> could cause data loss.

Yes, of course.  Sorry about that -- I didn't mean to confuse 1.11.1
with older versions!  :-)

                                                                Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;            <address@hidden>;           <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]