Re: Moving to Pserver from .rhosts

[dominic . afriat]

This is the second reply that implies that .rhosts is superior to pserver - can someone explain why?

I had to make this decision recently and concluded that pserver was the prefered way...

address@hidden (Greg A. Woods) Sent by: address@hidden 12/11/2002 21:56 Please respond to info-cvs

To:        Mahantesh <address@hidden>         cc:        address@hidden         Subject:        Re: Moving to Pserver from .rhosts

[ On Tuesday, November 12, 2002 at 19:28:49 (+0530), Mahantesh wrote: ]
> Subject: Moving to Pserver from .rhosts
>
> we have working repository running right now. Currently the mode of
> authentication is .rhosts.
> We are planning to migrate the mode of authentication to pserver. Also
> after moving to pserver mode we should be
> able have all the versions we have right now. 

Why would you ever even dream of doing that?

Why not upgrade to SSH (and ~/.shosts :-) instead?

-- 
                                                                                                                                        Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;            <address@hidden>;           <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>


_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs