[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we have an alternative to tag, to record status of cvs repo
From: |
Greg A. Woods |
Subject: |
Re: Do we have an alternative to tag, to record status of cvs repo |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:24:41 -0400 (EDT) |
[ On Tuesday, April 22, 2003 at 20:18:26 (+0530), Satya Prasad DV wrote: ]
> Subject: Do we have an alternative to tag, to record status of cvs repo
>
> In our orgn, we need to keep track of the code base status after each
> engineer's check in is done. We were using tagging to keep track of this.
> But the huge number of tags getting created over a long time have made the
> CVS repository bloated with tags. This is also making the sync. of
> repository with our branch located elsewhere too long.
I think what you really should do is convert to using a versioning tool
that is based on the idea of maintaining a working baseline.
I would suggest Aegis:
<URL:http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~millerp/aegis.html>
It's either that or you'll have to use branches in CVS a lot more extensively.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>