Re: Multilevel vendor branch import

[Rodolfo Schulz de Lima]

On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:52:19AM -0800, Mark D. Baushke wrote:
> CVS is a more mature product and needs to move a bit more conservatively
> oriented when considering large changes in how it works. I suspect there
> will be a place for cvs even after svn 1.0 is released.

I know, it's easy to turn a mature, useful and complicated project like 
cvs in a complete mess. Except for some exoteric uses, CVS fits the bill 
of 95% of our versioning needs, and I've been using it for 2 years know 
without major complains. Those 5% missing is due to the lack of 
copy/move/rename changes in a repository (at least in my opinion). Maybe 
some way of recording, alongside with the diffs, the file name of a 
revision, I don't know. RCS doesn't give us the flexibility needed :(

Rodolfo Lima.