[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Case insensitivity ad nauseum
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Case insensitivity ad nauseum |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:59:17 -0500 (EST) |
Jim.Hyslop writes:
>
> >From the time we first learned to read, we have never considered the case of
> a word to be significant in determining the identity of an object being
> referred to.
That simply is not true, there are times when case is significant. The
words "Polish" and "polish", for example. Likewise, "Catholic" and
"catholic".
> My name is Jim. My name is also JIM. If you're talking about
> me, then it doesn't matter whether you spell my name "Jim," "JIM," or any of
> the other six variations involving case: the label that you apply to me is
> not case-sensitive.
You must not have had a very good grade-school English teacher; mine
would have insisted that only "Jim" is correct.
-Larry Jones
Whatever it is, it's driving me crazy! -- Calvin
- Re: Case insensitivity ad nauseum, (continued)
Re: Case insensitivity ad nauseum, Donald Sharp, 2003/11/05
Re: Case insensitivity ad nauseum, Kevin Layer, 2003/11/05
Re: Case insensitivity ad nauseum,
Larry Jones <=
RE: Case insensitivity ad nauseum, Greg A. Woods, 2003/11/06
Message not available
RE: Case insensitivity ad nauseum, Jim.Hyslop, 2003/11/05
RE: Case insensitivity ad nauseum, Jim.Hyslop, 2003/11/05
RE: Case insensitivity ad nauseum, Jim.Hyslop, 2003/11/05
Re: Case insensitivity ad nauseum, Larry Jones, 2003/11/06