[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tagging with -D option
From: |
Mark D. Baushke |
Subject: |
Re: Tagging with -D option |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Apr 2004 16:45:26 -0800 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Derek Robert Price <address@hidden> writes:
> I like the idea of treating `-r <tag>:<datespec>' like `-j
> <tag>:<datespec>'. Not that I have time to code it just now, but has
> anyone come up with objections to that format?
I like the idea of `-r <tag>:<datespec>' in general.
However, it becomes harder for things like cvs log where
`-r <tag>:<token>' already treats <token> as rev2.
This means that
cvs log -rmytag:now
would be ambiguous. Is 'now' a tag or a time?
-- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAbLem3x41pRYZE/gRAjefAJ9vEVWN1xvNtuIwa7LMSXXf79ZjxgCgorhy
rEraHQqiltix/fCLAmPRguE=
=QQpo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Tagging with -D option, Fouts Christopher (6452), 2004/04/01
- RE: Tagging with -D option, Jim.Hyslop, 2004/04/01
- Re: Tagging with -D option, Larry Jones, 2004/04/01
- Re: Tagging with -D option, Derek Robert Price, 2004/04/01
- Re: Tagging with -D option,
Mark D. Baushke <=
- Re: Tagging with -D option, Larry Jones, 2004/04/02
- Re: Tagging with -D option, Derek Robert Price, 2004/04/02
- Re: Tagging with -D option, Larry Jones, 2004/04/02
- Re: Tagging with -D option, Derek Robert Price, 2004/04/02
RE: Tagging with -D option, Jim.Hyslop, 2004/04/01