RE: Import question

[Christopher.Fouts]

Can you "export" (not check out) the latest files you need 
from a current vendor branch, which should contain the changes 
you want (correct), add (not cvs add) your new files, test, 
and then import all the files to a new vendor branch?

-chris

>-----Original Message-----
>From: address@hidden 
>[mailto:address@hidden
>] On Behalf Of Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IOP
>Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 10:36 AM
>To: address@hidden
>Subject: RE: Import question
>
>
>> From: Christopher.Fouts
>> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 4:22 PM
>> To: address@hidden
>> Subject: RE: Import question
>> 
>> 
>> Test BEFORE importing!
>
>Sure but I need the merge of the local changes.  But I can't 
>get them without the import or can I?
>
>
>> 
>> 
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: address@hidden
>> >[mailto:address@hidden
>> >] On Behalf Of Larry Jones
>> >Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 10:12 AM
>> >To: Lemke,Michael IZ/HZA-IOP
>> >Cc: 'address@hidden'
>> >Subject: Re: Import question
>> >
>> >
>> >Lemke, Michael  IZ/HZA-IOP writes:
>> >> 
>> >> When I do a cvs import of a new vendor version the new
>> files become
>> >> the head revision.  I'd like to do the import such that it doesn't
>> >> affect HEAD. Only after I've tested the new stuff I want it 
>> >to become
>> >> HEAD.  Of course, it should work with local changes merged in just
>> >> like the standard way of doing it on the trunk.  How can 
>I do this?
>> >
>> >Unfortunately, CVS doesn't have any convenient way to let
>> you do that.
>> >
>> >-Larry Jones
>> >
>> >I told her to expect you to deny everything. -- Calvin
>> >
>> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Info-cvs mailing list
>address@hidden
>http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
>