[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cvs vs. clearcase?
From: |
Paul Sander |
Subject: |
Re: cvs vs. clearcase? |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:42:41 -0800 |
These are not valid reasons. Here's why:
- ClearCase MVFS is a filesystem that offers the same access to Unix
tools as any other filesystem. They need not be ported to specialized
environments to run under ClearCase.
- ClearCase clients are available on several flavors of Unix, including
Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, Linux, and others. Also, ClearCase views can be
mounted via NFS so that unsupported systems can also use them.
Consider being open-minded about ClearCase. Its capabilities are far
superior to CVS, and it even supports concurrent development.
On Nov 29, 2004, at 5:25 AM, address@hidden wrote:
I have a director asking why I don't want to user the company's
clear case server. One item I mentioned is the lack of integration
into unix tools and the lack of a unix client. Are these good/valid
reasons? What are other reasons?