Re: Annotate of Log output wrong

[Todd Denniston]

Hugh Gibson wrote:
> 
> Thanks for your detailed reply, Todd.
> 
> > I think that you will need to delete the first two lines for it to work
> > on an MS system.
> 
> Yes, that's effectively what I did.
> 
> > After deleting them I think that the ms system will queue off of the .pl
> > extension and send the script to the perl interpreter and it should just
> > work.
> 
> It did - up to a point. As I said, it locked up after getting the cvs log.
> I expect it was at the point of analysing all the log data and trying to
> find checkins that matched time-wise. But there was no CPU activity on the
> process, so it appears to have just hung.
> 
> Hugh
http://www.cvsnt.org/pipermail/cvsnt/2003-September/008591.html
do you get any different response when you run it like
perl cvs2cl
and which version (and maker [activestate??]) of perl.  

Also which version of WinCvs or CVSNT are you running on the 2k box?
http://www.cvsnt.org/pipermail/cvsnt/2004-January/010333.html

Ugh I love MS's 'were almost POSIX' implementation, it makes things SOO
easy.

I also noticed there may be a cvs2cl.py that comes with CVSNT, no clue if 1)
it does the same thing as cvs2cl.pl, or 2) comes with a python engine to run
it.
https://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id=10072&release_id=221779

CygWin MIGHT be easier at this point.

Wouldn't happen to have a unix box, or knopix disk, handy so you could try
the script out? :)

-- 
Todd Denniston
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) 
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter