[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Versioning modules instead of files?

From: Todd Denniston
Subject: Re: Versioning modules instead of files?
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:28:49 -0500

Matthias Kaeppler wrote:
> Sergei Organov wrote:
> > Matthias Kaeppler <address@hidden> writes:
> >>It would be a lot better, if the versioning would happen on the module base,
> >>i.e. you can commit the content of your sandbox as a new version of your
> >>program rather than new versions of the individual files.
> >>
> >>
> >>Is that possible somehow? I can't find any means at all in the documentation
> >>to keep track and control the /program/ version instead of the individual
> >>source file revisions.
> >
> >
> > "cvs tag" is your friend:
> >
> > <quote manual>
> > </quote manual>
> Ah okay, thanks for pointing me to the right direction.
> I'll read up on tagging and come back if I have further questions.
In anticipation of what I expect your next question to be:
CVS keeps the checkin logs with each individual file, how do I get a log
that shows a coherent picture of each checkin?

Please see cvs2cl:

There may be other tools to do it, but this one is my favorite.
Todd Denniston
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) 
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]