Re: cvs log question

[BoD]

Larry Jones a écrit :
> That shouldn't happen.  Can you post an example of incorrect log output
> along with the result of ``cvs version''?

Here is the command I used:

cvs log -rsrm4_1_0_0-1_0_0 -S -b > test.log

Here is an extract of the resulting test.log file:

=============================================================================

RCS file: 
/srm/framework/webapps/app/WEB-INF/conf/NavigationConfiguration.xml,v
Working file: webapps/app/WEB-INF/conf/NavigationConfiguration.xml
head: 1.1
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
symbolic names:
        DEMO_MACIF_V1_0: 1.1
        srm4_1_1_0_beta-demo: 1.1.0.2
        srm4_1_1_0_beta: 1.1
keyword substitution: kv
total revisions: 1;     selected revisions: 1
description:
----------------------------
revision 1.1
date: 2006/05/02 09:10:41;  author: blubek;  state: Exp;  kopt: kv; 
commitid: 1640445722100000;
conf
=============================================================================

This file NavigationConfiguration.xml only exists on the HEAD, but not 
on the specified branch (srm4_1_0_0-1_0_0).


Note: during the execution of the command some warnings are logged of 
the form :
cvs server: warning: no revision `srm4_1_0_0-1_0_0' in 
`/srm/framework/src/java/com/oalia/frmwrk/init/dev/RatingInitializer.java,v'


cvs version
Client: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.11.17 (client/server)
Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVSNT) 2.0.9 (client/server)

Thank you very much for your help.

BoD