[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Exp state on top of dead
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Exp state on top of dead |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:57:41 -0400 (EDT) |
CARTER-HITCHIN, David, GBM writes:
>
> For branch versions, perhaps, but if I had 'dead' at 1.5 and 'Exp' at 1.6
> that would be a problem, no?
No. That just means that the file was removed, but then later added
back again (or a completely new file was added that just happened to
have the same name). The problem is a live file in the Attic (or a dead
file that's not in the Attic).
-Larry Jones
The surgeon general should issue a warning about playing with girls. -- Calvin
- RE: Exp state on top of dead, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, GBM, 2006/09/04
- RE: Exp state on top of dead, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, GBM, 2006/09/05
- RE: Exp state on top of dead, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, GBM, 2006/09/05
- RE: Exp state on top of dead, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, GBM, 2006/09/05
- RE: Exp state on top of dead, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, GBM, 2006/09/05
- RE: Exp state on top of dead, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, GBM, 2006/09/06
- RE: Exp state on top of dead, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, GBM, 2006/09/08