Re: Branch Tag not a branch tag

[petesea]

On Fri, 2 May 2008, Larry Jones wrote:

> Dan Peterson writes:
> > Would there be any harm in simply doing this:
> >
> >    cvs rtag -r foo_branch -F -b foo_branch tree
>
> Yes.  If it works at all (which I'm not sure it does), it would mess up 
> all the currently correct files by creating a *new* branch rooted at the 
> tip of the exiting branch with the same name as the existing branch, 
> which would then become nameless.

Wouldn't the lack of a -B flag prevent the command from changing any tags 
which are already branch tags?