info-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: CVS lock script


From: Saleh, Mai
Subject: RE: CVS lock script
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:33:18 +0000

Hi Mathew , 

Thanks for your reply 
I just needed to prevent write operation will taking a backup , could you 
please tell me what would be the risk of taking a repository back while not 
preventing a write to it will the whole repository be corrupted or only the 
files that was being written during backup operation 




Thanks & BRs

Mai Saleh
IT Global Technologies & Infrastructure
Software Tools Engineer


-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Ogilvie [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 7:58 AM
To: Saleh, Mai
Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
Subject: Re: CVS lock script

> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 07:41:50 +0000
> From: "Saleh, Mai" <address@hidden>
> To: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> Subject: CVS lock script
> 
> Hi ,
> 
> I need to know is there any open source lock and unlock cvs repository  
> script that can be used by corporates for free
> 
> Thanks & BRs
> 
> Mai Saleh

It may depend on exactly what you mean by locking a cvs repository.

In most cases it is probably easier to either manually configure existing 
facilities (or write a short shell script to do so), rather than try to find, 
learn, and configure some third party script.

For example:

CVSROOT/commitinfo or other *info hooks might be useful for complex access 
policies.  I may have seen a reference years ago to a third party configurable 
script you can reference from here to make it easier to configure 
branches/directory access, but I don't remember the name...

CVSROOT/config includes a "LockDir", which if defined would allow you to use 
file system permissions (owner, group, mode) to control access at a directory 
level within the main repository, including read-only and/or no access.  [This 
is for temporary locks while CVS is processing a directory; it needs those 
locks even if it is doing a read-only operation...]

If you just want to have a stable version for several operations, maybe just 
use branches and/or tags appropriately?

If you use pserver access, you might be able to temporarily disable all access 
by tweaking a line in an xinetd or inetd config file...

Or temporarily disable all access by altering the permissions on just the top 
level directory of the repository.

                        - Matthew Ogilvie

P.S.: On a tangent, have you considered upgrading to a newer tool?
Subversion has a similar UI and is often considered somewhat more modern.  
Also, while tools like git and mercurial have a steeper learning curve, they 
are significantly more flexible.  The main reason I haven't gotten around to to 
unsubscribing from this CVS list is that the traffic has dropped to nearly 0...



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]