Re: RFC: New Response type to aid rlog reponse parsing

[Thorsten Glaser]

Hi,

>I have documented this [1] for interested parties. It is a rather
>long-ish document. I have done my best to organize the information for
>easy digestion and reference.

how interesting. I’ve added a “cvs suck” command to the 1.12 flavour
shipped with MirBSD and Debian (current de-facto “upstream” of GNU
CVS as I seem to be the only one working on it) to download individual
,v files, but that would of course only work if the server supports it.

>Attached is a patch implementing LOGM change against cvs-1.11.23

I’ve looked at it and it’s trivial and probably correct enough,
so I’ll patch my 1.12 branch similarily and add to the (in)“sanity”
testsuite. Then you’ll only have to convince the OpenCVS maintainers
to adapt (if it still exists, that is, haven’t checked) and everyone
is compatible.

Thanks,
//mirabilos
PS: Due to Google’s inability to honour basic Internet standards,
    direct messages from Googlemail to my eMail address are likely
    to not reach me, or only delayed by up to several weeks.
-- 
> Wish I had pine to hand :-( I'll give lynx a try, thanks.

Michael Schmitz on nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k
a.k.a. {news.gmane.org/nntp}#news.gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k in pine